Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Gardner, I.V. (Bella)

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Koen Hindriks

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Evaluation is an essential step to evolve your conversational recipe recommendation agent from an agent that can conduct a basic conversation that offers minimal functionality to a user to an agent that can provide a great user experience for all users. Effectiveness, efficiency, robustness, and user satisfaction are important metrics here. An agent is effective if it can guarantee task completion. Such an agent adequately assists a user with completing the task at hand. It is efficient if the number of turns needed to achieve the goal in a conversation is optimized. It is robust if it can handle all phrases that users kinds of user expressions that you might reasonably be expected to say expect to be used, and can handle the different directions that a conversation may take. Finally, a conversational agent is satisfying if a user experiences the conversation as satisfying.

Sources

For the analysis, looking at a range of quantitative measures can provide valuable insights. Examples of information that can be extracted from the MARBEL agent logs and used for analysis include (but are not limited to):

  • Number of utterances/intents per interaction

  • Number of fallback intents

  • Number of repair actions (b12, b13) per interaction (see Capability 4: Handling Unexpected Intents)

  • Variety in intents and entities (are there any unused intents?)

  • Confidence values for the intent classification (are there any patterns of specific intents having low/high confidence values?)

  • Interaction length (in time)

You can also inspect the Dialogflow training tool and agent validation to learn more about how well intent matching performed, and what issues your Dialogflow agent may have.

Testing

By testing, you can find out the deficiencies of the agent that need to be addressed so that it will not break down easily. This is typically done in an agile manner, starting with a simple agent that functions minimally, where rounds of tests and improvements follow one another. You will follow two stages in the current project.FirstDuring development, you will should focus on agent testing:

...

Second, at At the end of the project, you will do a small pilot user study:

...

You will need to document agent the testing and the pilot user study that your team performed in your final report.