Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

Version 1 Next »

The end report should span no more than 10 pages, and discuss the progress and results of your project. Use the following structure for your report:

  • Title, group number, student names, emails and student numbers.

  • Introduction (1/2 page): briefly introduce your cooking assistant project.

  • SUPPLE Dialogflow Engine (1-2 pages): Discuss your understanding of how the SUPPLE dialog engine works and how it is integrated with the Google Dialogflow agent. What makes this set-up suitable for a cooking assistant implementation?

  • Design choices and rationale (3-4 pages): The center of your report, where you describe the different design choices you have made while implementing your agent. Make sure to give a motivation for each of them. Design choices can relate to particular aspects (like the way in which certain conversational activities were modelled, or how repair was enabled) as well as more general aspects (like the language style and personality) of the agent. This section should give a complete picture of your agent and the vision behind its design. It should also describe and motivate the aspects of the agent you have added as improvements.

  • Evaluation (3-4 pages): Discuss your testing set-up and results, and the performance of your final cooking assistant. On the one hand, this section should indicate for the different components in the Rubric (all rows within ‘Agent functionality’ and ‘orientation’ and ‘overview’ within ‘Visual support’) how well they perform according to your test. On the other hand, the section should give insight into the general quality of the conversational agent and required improvements. To what extent would the cooking assistant be helpful for an actual user that wants to cook a meal in its kitchen, and, most importantly, in what ways would the agent need to be improved and extended to make it usable to this end? Identifying current deficiencies of the agent reflects insight rather than modesty, and is highly valuable. In addition to identifying improvements, describe and motivate how they may be implemented.

  • Conclusion (1 page): Write a brief conclusion about the project itself, as well as a reflection on the process (what went well and what could have been done better?).

  • Appendix (not included in regular page count): Weekly progress reports.

  • No labels

0 Comments

You are not logged in. Any changes you make will be marked as anonymous. You may want to Log In if you already have an account.